Skip to content
Chișinău Forum 2023 poster

Does BRICS threaten the globalist agenda?

The BIRCS Summit in South Africa produced today, 24th August news that has already surrounded the world. In addition to Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the following countries also declared their adherence to this organization: Argentina, Egypt, Iran, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia. Starting from 2024, these six new countries will be affiliated with BRICS, but this is just a formality. The decision was taken and most probably some or even many countries from the former so-called Third World will join this economical organization.

As mentions the Russian news agency TASS:

In addition, by the next meeting in 2024, the financial institutions of the member countries will draft proposals for using national currencies and common payment instruments.

Some are already prophesying the imminent end of the American empire, others are enjoying the rise of China as the undisputed leader of the new conglomerate of states. But I would like to offer a cold shower to the enthusiasts who rush to applaud the geopolitical reconfiguration of the world, the triumph of multipolarity, of sovereignty and to announce the imminence of a golden age in international relations.

Primo. The possible or perhaps imminent collapse of the American empire and the rise of China as a world leader do not necessarily mean a happier future for the peoples of the world. Let's not forget, the world is not ruled by states, but by non-state entities, transnational corporations, influence groups and secret organizations that manipulate states in favor of their private interests. As an example, I bring to your attention Henry Kissinger's two visits to China, the first, secret, on July 9, 1971, and the last on July 20, 2023. The first was succeeded by Richard Nixon's visit in February 1972, and the last was preceded by the visit of Bill Gates on June 16, 2023.

Kissinger with Xi Jinping

We remember well how China became an economic miracle and the factory of the world, who had to win and who to lose as a result of the economic deregulation plotted by the banksters, which have led to the deindustrialization of Western countries, the escape of companies and capital from the Western to China to the detriment of working and middle class of, but to the advantage of billionaires based in the USA and Europe.

Even the technological miracle of today's China is no stranger to the perfectly functional complicity between the smart boys from Silicon Valley and the Beijing regime. The whole history of capitalism and its expansion on a global scale has shown that the relations between an economically strong country and one “developing” nation logically leads to the economic domination of the first one over the other. That is, we are dealing with the most direct economic colonialism. In the case of BRICS countries it is not and cannot be different. So why would we applaud the liberation of countries from the American / Western yoke and their subordination to China's economic interests?

Now another important aspect. The BRICS countries have so far not shown any special political solidarity between them. Thus, for example, following Russia's military intervention in Ukraine, the UN General Assembly adopted a number of resolutions condemning this intervention. And Russia has never obtained anything more from its “partners” from BRICS than at best abstentions. That is, it is premature to talk about a political alliance, much less a military one.

Coming back to the 15th BRICS summit in Johannesburg. Vladimir Putin did not arrive at the event for fear of being arrested and sent directly to Hague. The friendship between Russia and South Africa is so strong that it cannot guarantee the Russian president even personal security on his territory. He is replaced by his brave Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. It seems that the Russian president in general will refrain from traveling abroad. Thus, the announced visit to Turkey does not seem to take place. It is rumored that Erdogan will be the one to arrive in Moscow.

You have probably noticed the presence of the highest honorary guest at the ongoing event in Johannesburg, António Guterres, the UN Secretary General. That is, the respective conglomerate of countries gathers under the same UN umbrella. More than that. All official statements of BRICS meetings always emphasize that they remain faithful to the “UN ruling role” in international affairs. And if we know who controls the UN and what kind of policies this organization imposes on all countries, then it is easy to deduce that it is premature to express jubilation with regard of this event.

Namely, through the UN, the “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” is imposed on all mankind. It is from here that “the green agenda” emanates, as well as the myth of global warming, gender theory, transgenderism, feminism, etc., etc. The very idea of global governance, that is, of a world government emanates precisely from this organization. So what does it matter if in a techno-scientific world tyranny the head of the concentration camp is American or Chinese?

We have not forgotten at all the nefarious role of China in the organization and unfolding of the false Covid-19 pandemic. Nor the particularly wild state terror imposed by this totalitarian regime against its own population, including compulsory mass “vaccination”. Do not forget that the Beijing official was also present at the Covid-19 special operations training exercise in October 2019 “Event 201” in New York. Nor the close relationship between Anthony Fauci and the Wuhan lab. We also took note of Bill Gates' recent visit to Beijing on June 16, 2023.

Bill Gates with Xi Jinping

We remind you that the UN signed a strategic partnership agreement with WEF in June 2019[1]. This document highlights:

  • The UN-Forum Partnership was signed in a meeting held at United Nations headquarters between UN Secretary-General António Guterres and World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
  • The partnership identifies six areas of focus ― financing the 2030 Agenda, climate change, health, digital cooperation, gender equality and empowerment of women, education and skills ― to strengthen and broaden their combined impact by building on existing and new collaborations…

And the number one guest and dear friend of Klaus Schwab at the WEF meetings is none other than the Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

Klaus Schwab with Xi Jinping

Coming back to the fantastic event in South Africa which supposedly would reshape or more precisely reset the destinies of humanity let me quote from the official statement of the UN Secretary-General António Guterres made at this meeting, quoted on the official UN website:

As the global community moves towards multipolarity, we desperately need ― and I have been vigorously advocating for ― a strengthened and reformed multilateral architecture based on the UN Charter and international law.

― António Guterres, Secretary General of the United Nations, speaking at the 15th BRICS summit in Johannesburg, South Africa. (see:

Gutteres warns the boys in BRICS to be obedient:

“Big Brother is watching you!”

The key word in this sentence is “multipolar”. And since the spokesman for the globalist forces who are rushing in every way to establish a single dystopian world government, in fact a technocratic tyranny on the scale of the whole world, we can draw one conclusion. The very idea of multipolarity is part of the general plan of the globalist elite or at least does not affect at all their efforts to establish single world governance.

By simplifying, we can reduce BRICS to the next photo gallery of accomplices in the establishment of the New World Order: Henry Kissinger, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, António Guterres, Antonio Fauci, Xi Jipping, Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus (formal head of WHO ). Of course, this group portrait is an incompetent one, and yet it is quite relevant to show that there is currently no state, no group of states that would oppose globalization and would be an alternative to the Great Reset, to the totalitarianism of techno-scientific, depopulation, i.e. technocracy and transhumanism. Between the collective West and BRICS, even if the rivalries are real, they are exclusively related to economic interests, the redistribution of resources and markets of the world between different interest groups. But both belligerent camps serve the same master, blindly subordinating themselves to his orders.

Beyond the smoke curtain of propaganda, we have no reason to rejoice yet. Multipolarity proves to be just a mask of globalist unipolarity. Or, if you will, as I spoke at the international conference on this subject on April 29:

“And since there is ONE COMMON AGENDA for all the countries of the world, multipolarity remains for the moment only a desirable perspective”.

Contact me:

My Telegram channel:

P.S .: After I published and distributed this article, I received a message from Mr. Jesse Zurawell, a journalist on TNT Radio in New York. To the question in the title of this article “Does BRICS threat the globalist agenda?” Jesse answers briefly: “No”. Here's what he writes:

A case in point is the second sentence in Putin’s address [emphasis mine]:

“I would like to note that holding such business forums on a regular basis, along with the systemic work of the BRICS Business Council, which brings together top businessmen and heads of major companies of the five countries, plays an immense practical role in promoting mutual trade and investments, enhancing cooperation ties and expanding direct dialogue among the business communities ― and thus effectively contributes to accelerated socio-economic growth of our states and achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.”

A better ending to this article could not even be thought of. Now I think it's clear why I've been insisting for three years that geopolitics in the classical sense of the word is dead and buried. The unique globalist command center is in full control of the international game.

  3. The Great Reset and the end of classic geopolitics:

Poza de profil

I. Roșca

a conservative journalist from the Republic of Moldova, who in the past was an anti-communist dissident, party leader, MP and deputy prime minister, who is now an anti-globalist author with strong Christian and nationalist convictions.