Skip to content
Chișinău Forum 2023 poster

BRICS Summit - the last nail in the multipolarity's coffin

I have to go back to my previous article dedicated to the same event [1] “Does BRICS threaten the globalist agenda?” ― because I missed a striking detail that actually represents the key of understanding this state conglomerate seen by some as a guarantee for a bright and non-imperialist future, in which the nations will be in a continuous state of jubilation, cooperation and prosperity. Material, of course, because this paradigm is not only dominant, but the only one valid at present.

It is known that you best hide one thing when you place it in the most visible place. This is exactly what happened at that international meeting, at least for me. Thanks again to my friend Jesse Zurawell of TNT Radio, New York for warning me on this issue.

So, to understand the essence of this rather amorphous and eclectic organisation it was enough to note the name of the event in Johannesburg, South Africa, August 22-24.

The theme of the session is “BRICS and Africa: Partnership for Mutually Accelerated Growth, Sustainable Development and Inclusive Multilateralism.” [emphasis mine]

As we see, “The 2030 UN Agenda for Sustainable Development” is the core mission of this group of countries.

This strategy of resetting the world in the interest of the globalist elite, which floated from the elaborations of the Club of Rome in the official documents of the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 [2] , finding its continuation in another UN event that took place in the same South African city two decades ago [3] . I am quoting from the official UN website:

The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002

Finally, there was the UN General Assembly in 2015 which refreshed the globalist strategy of imposing a single direction on all the countries of the world, known colloquially as the 2030 UN Agenda.

All these tedious things I have invoked above are well known to an informed public. But I mention them here only to show that BRICS has not deviated one iota from the general plan of establishing the New World Order prophesied by the globalists, and in the functions of an undeclared World Government it has taken over the UN in its entirety.

So what remains of the pretention of a new architecture of international relations? What is the major geopolitical rupture achieved by the BRICS? And what can any cosmetic changes in the international system mean if the game is led by the same private globalist entities that control the UN? The rule of arithmetic teaches us that changing the place of terms does not change the result. And the same premises lead to the same results. Especially when the driving force remains the same.

It is worth remembering that the very idea of creating this conglomerate of states with the acronym BRICS did not come from within any of them, but is the work of the transnational megacorporation Goldman Sachs, one of the key players in the world of financial sharks [4] . I also note that Goldman Sachs is one of the key owners of the Fed, which understood at some point that this group of countries could represent a huge opportunity for new investments.

Goldman Sachs art

The very intention to launch a possible new currency that would replace the dollar in trade between BRICS countries, even if it would be a danger to American dominance, would not necessarily endanger the world plutocracy. Such a currency could be worth something if, unlike the dollar, would be convertible into gold. And the world's number one gold controller is still the Rothschild clan. World cleptocracy is par excellence stateless, and throughout the history of capitalism it has successfully migrated from Italian cities to the Netherlands, then to the United Kingdom, and after WWII to the United States. So what would make us believe that these extraterritorial entities could not with the same success towards China and other BRICS countries?

We will not insist on who instigated the two world wars and who took advantage of them. We will not even remember who was at the origin of the League of Nations after WWI, and after WWII produced the United Nations. But it is good not to miss the role of the eternal philanthropists of the Rockefeller clan in creating and supporting the UN:

JDR Jr.’s deep interest in international relations was reflected by his many contributions to international causes. Perhaps most outstanding was his gift of $8.5 million in December 1946 for the purchase of the land for the permanent home of the United Nations in Manhattan. Previously, JDR Jr. had given the library building in Geneva to the League of Nations. [5]

Goldman Sachs art

And if we know these historical truths that reshaped the world in the 20th century, why not admit that in the 21st century, while WW III in its hybrid form is underway, wouldn't the same globalist elite do the same maneuver, preparing for UN reform? UN Secretary-General Guterres pointed out in his speech at the BRICS summit a few days ago this idea as bait for the public.

Now let's focus a little on two terms present in the name of the BRICS summit in Johannesburg, namely “Inclusive Multilateralism”. The term “inclusive” has recently been promoted by leaders of corporate capitalism along with notions such as “public-private partnership” as an expression of the definitive subordination of states to the private interests of “money masters” who are preparing to be masters of the world.

The so-called Inclusive Capitalism Council was created on December 8, 2020 [6] . He brings together all the major gangsters of Big Money, who launched themselves using Pope Francis as a brand. This pope is a faithful servant of the globalist elite, supporting both the LGBT agenda and the myth of global warming, and any other initiative of corporate capitalism. The true leaders of this international mafia who has subordinated all states and all international organizations do not even hide too much. Please applaud VIP no. 1 of this fantastic initiative to make humanity happy, madam Lynn Forester de Rothschild:

Lynn Forester de Rothschild is a Founding and Managing Partner of Inclusive Capital Partners, which seeks positively differentiated returns by deploying its governance skills and value investment discipline to improve environmental and societal performance of the businesses in which it invests. She is also the Founder of the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism and the Council for Inclusive Capitalism [7] .

A meeting with religious leaders

Let's go back to the term “Multilateralism”. I will not delve into the subject of various schools in the field of international relations; Kissinger did it for all in his time. I'm just sending you to the Wikipedia [8] page on this topic, quoting a single sentence from this source:

International organizations, such as the United Nations (UN) and the World Trade Organization, are multilateral in nature.

Sounds good, but is functioning badly. Those who are able to capture the big picture know that behind the persons like Guterres are the real players. And the treacherous and soft imposition of an agenda common to all states through such organizations is a verified technique of globalists.

Therefore, given the circumstances invoked above, I emphasize again that the BRICS is not an alternative to the global governance of globalists, but an integral part of it. And the existence of major rivalries and even the wars between the various groups of states does not contradict at all their common agenda drawn from above through the UN or WHO. On the contrary, these divisions and conflicts serve as an excellent smokescreen for advancing the globalist strategy.

I leave the practitioners of oneiric geopolitics or, if you will, of magical realism in international relations (term borrowed from literature) to practice in theorizing the emergence of alternative poles to the globalist system. Personally, I prefer the truth, which becomes really striking.

In conclusion, I return to the thesis set out in the title of this article. The recent BRICS summit hit the last nail in the coffin of multipolarity. The rest is just an illusion, a confusion between reality and desirable or sometimes pure propaganda.

Contact me:

My Telegram channel:

Poza de profil

Iurie Roșca [Yuri Roshka]

a conservative journalist from the Republic of Moldova, who in the past was an anti-communist dissident, party leader, MP and deputy prime minister, who is now an anti-globalist author with strong Christian and nationalist convictions.