For several years, the Republic of Moldova, traditionally marginal in the world press, has become very visible on the map of media and politicians concerns. This is because the war in Ukraine is happening right on the border of Moldova.
The Chisinau regime, consisting exclusively of mercenaries from the Soros network and totally obedient to the Brussels bureaucracy, supported by its Western patrons, says that the country is the victim of a hybrid attack from Russia. And unfortunately, he’s absolutely right.
On the other hand, the political opposition affiliated to Moscow criticizes the political power in Chisinau for its affiliation with Western power centers, accusing it of complicity with the EU and the US in the intention of attracting the country into a direct war against Russia. This time the pro-Russian political clientele is absolutely right. Western elites want to use Moldova as a bridgehead for not admitting the conquest by the Russian army of Odessa and the territorial junction with the Russian-controlled breakaway region of Transnistria.
Therefore, political partisanship and blind admiration for either the Moscow regime or the collective West divides the two rival camps into “good guys” and “bad guys”, applying the simplistic formula in black and white. Such an approach not only polarizes opinions outside the Republic of Moldova, but divides up to the risks of violent confrontations Moldovan society.
That is, we are dealing with some “horizontal interpretations”, at a very low level, the essence of the great challenges of the historical moment we are living. Naive people from both sides pour their admiration for Putin/Xi/BRICS and, symmetrically, their hatred of Ursula, Macron, Starmer, or vice versa, their hatred of the former and admiration for the latter.
Both sides accuse each other of instigating the expansion of war in the region, displaying their peaceful intentions and attachment to the rule of law and democratic norms. In their interpretation the war in Ukraine was caused exclusively by the Western-controlled Zelensky, or by Putin portrayed as the embodiment of absolute evil.
But the tragic irony is that each of the two sides that display diametrically opposed opinions is only partially right and only when they accuse their opponents of all the evils on earth. And, respectively, they lie brazenly when they attribute their noblest qualities to lovers of peace and democracy.
Both sides accuse each other of instigating the expansion of war in the region, displaying their peaceful intentions and attachment to the rule of law and democratic norms. In their interpretation, the war in Ukraine was caused exclusively because of Zelensky, controlled by the West, or by Putin, portrayed as the embodiment of absolute evil.
Few, very few are those who rise to the level of a holistic interpretation of the realities in the Republic of Moldova and, respectively, in the region and in the world as a whole. Although such analysts exist both in the anglosphere and in the francophone environment. But these are only the exception that confirms the general rule that shows that there has been a dramatic drop in analytical capacity, sacrificed in favor of false dichotomies, stemming from delusions and very subjective cultural-historical preferences.
To see that the war in Ukraine is actually the result of concerted actions by the same globalist command center, located in the West, which equally influences the regimes in Kiev and Moscow, can not everyone, even when it comes to respectable authors. The intellectual trap defined by the formula “wishful thinking” offers perfect psychological comfort to the exponents of both camps. We do not consider here the multitude of mercenaries and moral prostitutes who promote one of the two narratives for strictly pecuniary reasons.
Thus, Moldova, this small state, extremely vulnerable and subject to major geopolitical influences, is pushed to choose between two formulas of vassalage. Either sacrifice their national interests to Western plutocracy, or to gangsters with imperial ambitions in Moscow. Tertium non datur.
In fact, things are like this. Geopolitical rivalries are instrumentalised by exacerbating historical animosities and disputes, linguistic, ethnic and/or regilgious tensions by New World Order strategies that can be more quickly listed as a result of multiple regional wars, which are pushed towards a destructive world war. It is about inducing a permanent state of emergency. Through false pandemics, through the false theory of global warming, through artificial economic crises and, behold, by staging bloody wars.
But in the conditions of fierce animosities few are those who can afford to abandon the position of passionate viewer of a football match when watching the geopolitical show. When our favourites risk losing political power or the favourites of others are prevented from coming to power, they are no longer left for a cold analysis, based on the overall picture.
To talk today, before the parliamentary elections that will take place on Sunday, September 28, in Moldova, about the common globalist-satanist agenda, imposed on all countries, both in the West and in BRICS or the Global South in general, to mention the technocratic and transhumanist tyranny that is imposed at a huge speed in all countries of the world, to talk about digital prison, social credit, the elimination of cash money, etc restricting the most basic freedoms, showing that the UN and other globalist organizations everywhere impose the 2030 Agenda, vaccinism, feminism, transgenderism, abortion, etc. in today’s context seems to be entirely inappropriate.
The key question, circulated everywhere, is this: “Whose side are you on, the Russians or the Westerners? As far as I know, you are my ally or enemy.” And meanwhile the enemy at the top of the pyramid can act in total anonymity and impunity to hasten the transhumanist apocalypse.
PS: I apologize for possible language mistakes.
